It is currently 29 Mar 2024, 09:40
TrimTheKing wrote:...
I imagine this could be sorted by moving the cutter up/down though.
TrimTheKing wrote:Or there’s no reference face to go against the fence?
StevieB wrote:You have turned the timber upside down for the second cutter, but have the bevel on the wrong side of the cutter as a consequence?
RogerS wrote:TrimTheKing wrote:Or there’s no reference face to go against the fence?
Can you expand a little on what you mean ? If it's what I think you mean then you have touched on what turned out to be a right old BA...subsequently sorted out and so...
...heh heh...supplementary question. What was the 'right old BA' and how did I get round it ?
TrimTheKing wrote:RogerS wrote:TrimTheKing wrote:Or there’s no reference face to go against the fence?
Can you expand a little on what you mean ? If it's what I think you mean then you have touched on what turned out to be a right old BA...subsequently sorted out and so...
...heh heh...supplementary question. What was the 'right old BA' and how did I get round it ?
Because the face that will go against the fence as you cut has two different ‘heights’ then I think it would be difficult to get the depth of cut right unless you ‘tallest’ rise first then had the cutter buried in a sacrificial fence.
Sorry, not sure that makes sense but I’m struggling to articulate what makes sense in my minds eye.
RogerS wrote:But maybe put that 'featherboard' somewhere else ?
Dave R wrote:RogerS wrote:But maybe put that 'featherboard' somewhere else ?
Are you implying something?
Feather board on top and power feeder in front of the work?
Dave R wrote:You bought a new machine that would mill the entire moulding in one pass.
Dave R wrote:I thought you might by on time.
How about leaving the stock a bit over width and raising the second cutter above the top of the table so you leave some material under it?
HNY
Return to Machines & Power Toolery
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests