stephen.wood125 wrote:Hi Bob,
in spite of not having anything useful to add regarding your document, I'm a huge fan of the other revision-Excellently written and full of useful, easy to understand stuff. I look forward to reading the update.
Cheers
Steve
Thanks for your kind words Steve.
The latest addition in Annex G is a bit out of keeping with the rest of the document due to both the age of the motor and the level of detail.
I'd not come across such a motor before (1930s) and found very little indeed on the internet about it so when I had the opportunity to play with it in the flesh, I felt it would be helpful to others to write it up ( and to aid my memory) if I happened upon such a motor again.
I've also written a bit about my analysis methods when I come across something unknown and potentially suspect which may be of interest to readers.
Happy reading
Bob