It is currently 28 Mar 2024, 19:50
Rod wrote:Must be going for very large books, did you use the Sagulator?
Rod
sammy.se wrote:Your super square intrigues me. Do you have a previous post talking about them - why you designed them like that, and you you ensure super duper Squareness?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
9fingers wrote:I'd be concerned about movement in a "super" square made from tree wood.
I've made smaller ones for assembly work using MRMDF which seem to be very stable checked against my second best square which is a roofing/framing square that has been spot on since new - luck of the draw though I realise.
viewtopic.php?f=20&t=1152
I keep a moore and wright engineers square in a box solely for reference and it goes back in the box immediately after use.
Bob
Andyp wrote:I was going to ask why, with the use of two of your super dooper square thingies, you do not clamp all four sides at the same time?
Andyp wrote:Looks as if you should have made a bigger one. It does look good, belying the work envolved.
Woodbloke wrote:Andyp wrote:Looks as if you should have made a bigger one. It does look good, belying the work envolved.
Thanks Andy, there wasn't much room for anything bigger, but we've still kept the old one in the utility room for all the odds n'sods. Cyber Mars Bar (sans Novichock ) if you can spot the deliberate mistake? - Rob
Andyp wrote: Cyber Mars Bar (sans Novichock ) if you can spot the deliberate mistake? - Rob
TrimTheKing wrote:Deliberate mistake? Is the shelf a little too short? Cut the wrong side of the line maybe? Could be intentional though.
RogerM wrote:Very nice Rob. The elegance is in it's (apparent) simplicity.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests