It is currently 28 Mar 2024, 13:47
Mike G wrote:I've never worked with London Plane. If I ever come across any, I'm going to remedy that.
Woodbloke wrote:Mike G wrote:I've never worked with London Plane. If I ever come across any, I'm going to remedy that.
Wonderful, fantabulous stuff...as good as, if not better than, English Walnut - Rob
Rod wrote:I’ve got two chunks of the stuff, very heavy and dense but very easy to work.
Rod
Woodbloke wrote:Rod wrote:I’ve got two chunks of the stuff, very heavy and dense but very easy to work.
Rod
Interesting Rod, you must have something different? This is about the same weight as Walnut and works in a similar manner; lighter than oak though - Rob
9fingers wrote:Woodbloke wrote:Rod wrote:I’ve got two chunks of the stuff, very heavy and dense but very easy to work.
Rod
Interesting Rod, you must have something different? This is about the same weight as Walnut and works in a similar manner; lighter than oak though - Rob
My "wood book" gives the density as 0.62 g/cu cm.
Bob
Rod wrote:It seems a shame, cannot you just amend them?
Rod
MattS wrote:Lovely little draw! At that size, could the bottom have been a single piece?
Mike G wrote:Yeahbut.......did it need a central runner?
Rob, I presume your little gathering planned for this month has been cancelled. Is that right?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests