SamQ aka Ah! Q!
Old Oak
Sir Roger Daltrey. Nice one.
Mind you, there is also Dame Penny Mordaunt...
Mind you, there is also Dame Penny Mordaunt...
I'm not a fan of either Mike and certainly not the system but they justify awards by saying it's for charity work. Daltry does a lot for the teenage cancer trust I believe.Roger Daltry's contribution to music is ahead of Dave Gilmour's? Really?
Of course not, but it shows what an arbitrary and anachronistic system the honours system is.
You beat me to it … services to the kebab industry …At least Tess and Claudia have been doing their bit to entertain a vast proportion of the TV viewing public for many years but an 18yr pub game exponent![]()
Dave Gilmour does a lot for homeless charities, including giving his London house to one of them a few years ago. I only use him as an illustration, not to say that one is more worthy than another, but to make to point that the system is entirely aritrary. It's about who you know.I'm not a fan of either Mike and certainly not the system but they justify awards by saying it's for charity work. Daltry does a lot for the teenage cancer trust I believe.
What about the two female presenters of strictly come dancing? MBE for a part time extremely well paid job, taxpayer's money to boot.
It already is silly Mike, as you said it's who you know....................There's a danger that the whole thing could start looking a bit silly.......
Cameron's hairdresser?When lady penelope's chauffeur gets knighted for his public service you know the system is broken. I played a tiny part in getting simon weston his honor.
I was weighing his charity work Mike. Anything else I could have said has been well expressed by your good self and the other contributors.Roger Daltry's contribution to music is ahead of Dave Gilmour's? Really?
Of course not, but it shows what an arbitrary and anachronistic system the system is
Personally, I like the system, fault laden as it is, but then all systems are; difficult to point to one and say 'yep, that's a gud'n' - Rob
I'm probably wrong Rob but I'm also old enough to remember and I thought it was only John lennon and maybe Geoerge Harrison (not sure) who returned them years later. I know Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr were happy enough to accept a knighthood.Any recipient of said gongs who's distinctly unchuffed with it can always stick it the post and return it to Buck House. I'm old and ugly enough to remember that a certain Fab Four did the very same in the 60'sPerhaps Paula wotshername from the PO ought to get something...apart from a prison sentence.
Personally, I like the system, fault laden as it is, but then all systems are; difficult to point to one and say 'yep, that's a gud'n' - Rob
I completely disagree. Would you also do away with decorations for those in the Armed Forces (and civilians) who deliberately go into harms way? Would you have tackled the guy with the knives on London Bridge??? - RobAll these so called honours are just so outdated, do we really need to live in an age of "Lords & Ladies" as these titles have no relevance or meaning except social snobbery. People should do a good job because they want to and for me the best of the those are the ones who turned the honour down, once they are handed around like confetti they become meaningless anyway.
......Would you have tackled the guy with the knives on London Bridge??? - Rob
Of course not Mike; the actions that the individual(s) did on London Bridge were done without recourse to future awards and the same can be said for all those in the Armed Forces who go into action, wherever it is on the face of the globe. Both honour systems are equally valid and both are flawed. Why didn't Paddy Mayne of the SAS get a VC in WW2? The debate still continues - RobI'm not sure what that's got to do with the subject of honours. Are you really suggesting that they guy who tackled the terrorist did it just to get a gong.......or that Spectric wouldn't have done the same thing unless there was a gong involved?
As it happens, I agree that medals for valour are fine, and indeed, that every society needs to recognise stuff like that. I just smirk at the knighthoods for "services to X political party", and for civil servants, businessmen, sportsmen, actors etc who are just going about their normal daily business.
Read wot I writ above ^^ Both are valid and honourable systems (though flawed) where awards are given by HMG (not the Royal Family, with one or two exceptions) to both members of the Armed Forces, the general public and in exceptional circumstances, an island - RobThere is a huge difference in being given a military honour for duty above and beyond to being given the title of Sir or the likes which seem more easy to get. One is for bravery whilst being in a conflict and the other is what, much better to ditch the silly titles and award a civilian type medal for services to society or something.
"Heah, heah, Sah!"...as was heard on many occasions....I just smirk at the knighthoods for "services to X political party", and for civil servants, businessmen, sportsmen, actors etc who are just going about their normal daily business.
I reckon Sir 9fingers would of had this thread nipped in the bud some time agoRead wot I writ above ^^ Both are valid and honourable systems (though flawed) where awards are given by HMG (not the Royal Family, with one or two exceptions) to both members of the Armed Forces, the general public and in exceptional circumstances, an island - Rob
Edit - mods, probably time to close this thread down.