• Hi all and welcome to TheWoodHaven2 brought into the 21st Century, kicking and screaming! We all have Alasdair to thank for the vast bulk of the heavy lifting to get us here, no more so than me because he's taken away a huge burden of responsibility from my shoulders and brought us to this new shiny home, with all your previous content (hopefully) still intact! Please peruse and feed back. There is still plenty to do, like changing the colour scheme, adding the banner graphic, tweaking the odd setting here and there so I have added a new thread in the 'Technical Issues, Bugs and Feature Requests' forum for you to add any issues you find, any missing settings or just anything you'd like to see added/removed from the feature set that Xenforo offers. We will get to everything over the coming weeks so please be patient, but add anything at all to the thread I mention above and we promise to get to them over the next few days/weeks/months. In the meantime, please enjoy!

Redress after being acquitted

Wizard9999

Old Oak
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
0
Location
Eversley, Hampshire
I don't want to get into the specifics of the Ched Evans case as it is an emotive topics and I don't want to offend anyone. However, without opening an argument about the rights and wrongs of evidence being allowed, etc. it did make me wonder what redress / compensation somebody in Ched Evans' situation would be entitled to.

If I understand correctly he spent two years in prison for a crime he has now been found innocent of and even when he was released he seemed to be hounded out of being able to carry on his career as a footballer by many he felt his time in prison was insufficient punishment. I presume he would have been on tens of thousands a week before the trial, so his loss of earnings must run into the millions. Can he make a claim against the State or even bring a private action against his accuser? In the latter case I am sure it would be a PR disaster and I suspect her resources couldn't come close to his loss of income, so I sure he won't. But does he have a legal right to do so?

Terry.
 
Doug":1j52abvg said:

Interesting Doug. I guess I should rephrase my post to say "...a crime he has now not been found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of..." instead of "...a crime he has now been found innocent of...". But everyone does say 'innocent until proven guilty'. I believe in Scotland there is a third option of 'unproven', but in English law I thought if you were not guilty you were by definition innocent.

But still I wonder about compensation. As the article you link to points out, the all edged victim never made an accusation she simply said she could not remember what happened, so I guess that answers the question as to whether the all edged victim could be sued.

Terry.
 
Back
Top