So ...building on Bob's suggestion, some ply bolted to the table. Decided to put some slots in to allow me to make gradual cuts. I have the option to fit at the rear of this ply a bearer bolted to the table and to fit spacers between ply and bearer to act as a backup stop in case vibration etc makes the ply bolts work loose.
Then I reduced the height of the ply to just below my template thickness ('cos that's what Eric Stephenson says'.)
That is going to be spinning very fast soon
Offering up template and ply tells me that they need cutting if I'm going to be able to swing the template while making the cut
Now on p 143 of Stephenson's book he says in the ring fence section
"....with an operating point furthest from the support perhaps 5mm wide...."
Now, as we shall see in a moment, I misunderstood this but not sure of the remedy.
Offering up the template told me that that too needed shaping. So using some quality cardboard as a template, I played around with the shape, swinging it past the operating point as if I were making the cut for real.
and that told me that my hands would be a bit too close for my liking. So I Domino'd some extension pieces to keep my hands out of harms way.
\
Downside is that they overhang my sliding table and so makes it too easy to tip the template with disastrius results. So...that needs some attention.
Getting there but it's not as easy as it looks.
Template nicely trimmed with good lead-in.
But the trailing cut needs further work but the available bolt holes in the spindle table top limits the minimum size of the ply.
which means cutting more off the template.
And it was at this point that I realised I'd misunderstood Stephenson because although the operating point lines up nicely underneath the cutline of the cutter
..if I swing it round too far then the cutter is going to take far too much off...because I've cut too much away from my ply
:eusa-think: :eusa-think: