New often means "gimmicky" but this one looks interesting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8PcEm1_Cw0
Any thoughts?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8PcEm1_Cw0
Any thoughts?
AndyT":3o6jqa7u said:I agree with Al. If the adjuster is too stiff to turn, the first thing to do is to make sure that all moving parts are lubricated and free of dust and dirt, then check that the screw holding the lever cap down is not over-tightened
Andy Kev.":2dmzc6tv said:So that’s a resounding “no” then.![]()
In my innocence I had thought that it could be of use.
Well done, Andy - I knew there was at least one, but my brief search yielded it not.AndyT":1tiumjjq said:Of course, using an adjuster that looks like something off an old water tap is not a new idea - The Birmingham Plane Company of Connecticut were doing it in the 1890s:
![]()
Mike G":1nrlvzqf said:I humbly suggest that if your dexterity and finger strength are so compromised as to not be able to adjust a plane with a normal knob, then hand-tool woodworking is going to be something of a challenge for you.
thetyreman":zhc01083 said:well I can't watch anything by wood by wright or cosman so that's me out....
Mike G":esaipfmy said:thetyreman":esaipfmy said:well I can't watch anything by wood by wright or cosman so that's me out....
Me too.
The only Sellers I watch from time to time is Peter, not Paul - RobMike G":nenw3cg7 said:Yeah, but I'm not honestly sure why anyone experienced would want to watch Sellers anyway.
Woodbloke":1udx2xts said:The only Sellers I watch from time to time is Peter, not Paul - RobMike G":1udx2xts said:Yeah, but I'm not honestly sure why anyone experienced would want to watch Sellers anyway.

I have tried it on a No.4 and a No.5. With the No.5 there is ample room. With the No.4 it is OK with a three finger grip and the index finger pointing forward.Mike G":3l0fpb92 said:Did that leave room for your fingers gripping the handle?
Yes, I don't think it is likely to catch onLons":2cwc8r7l said:Well done for making it but it just looks weird and out of place, not for me.
fiveeyes":3lmyi2y9 said:Luddites
rxh":41oe5u7c said:I have tried it on a No.4 and a No.5. With the No.5 there is ample room. With the No.4 it is OK with a three finger grip and the index finger pointing forward.Mike G":41oe5u7c said:Did that leave room for your fingers gripping the handle?
Andy Kev.":2nh5j245 said:rxh":2nh5j245 said:I have tried it on a No.4 and a No.5. With the No.5 there is ample room. With the No.4 it is OK with a three finger grip and the index finger pointing forward.Mike G":2nh5j245 said:Did that leave room for your fingers gripping the handle?
Despite being the bloke who flagged this up, I was/am entirely agnostic on whether it is necessary or not.
From your experiment, could one conclude that if a manufacturer introduced it as standard on new planes (with no attendant price increase) that it would represent:
a. A slightly worse set up.
b. A slight improvement.
c. It would be neither here nor there.
I ask this as someone who has no difficulty at all in using conventional adjustment knobs but who thinks from the look of it that it could perhaps qualify for verdict b.
rxh":293atzrx said:Well, I couldn’t resist making my own version to try out the idea![]()
As I don’t have a left-handed tap of the right size, I made it to clamp onto the existing knob. It does make adjustment very easy but I would say that it is not a significant improvement on the existing wheel (as predicted in some of the comments above). Anyway, it was in interesting exercise. I would recommend anyone considering buying the commercial version to try one before buying.
MrH":2h9f6p85 said:....the "pimp my tool" market....